Sat Jan 29 15:13:59 2005
──────────────────────
Many men seem to have regarded the capacity for rational thought as exclscively male;women, they assumed, were led only by their passions. While gentlemen mastered the arts of rhetoric and warfare, gentlewomen were expected to display the virtue of silence and good housekeepings. Among upper-class males, the will to dominate others was acceptable and indeed admired; the same will in women was condemned as a grotesque and dangerous aberration.
看到這段文字氣得我拍案叫幹！
這是風行於四百年前社會的迂腐思想了，是現在呢？
有先進到哪裡嗎？有嗎？
「？」
Work Cited
Abrams, M. H., and Stephen Greenblatt, eds. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 7th ed. Vol. 1. New YOrk: Norton, 2000.
──────────────────────
Many men seem to have regarded the capacity for rational thought as exclscively male;women, they assumed, were led only by their passions. While gentlemen mastered the arts of rhetoric and warfare, gentlewomen were expected to display the virtue of silence and good housekeepings. Among upper-class males, the will to dominate others was acceptable and indeed admired; the same will in women was condemned as a grotesque and dangerous aberration.
看到這段文字氣得我拍案叫幹！
這是風行於四百年前社會的迂腐思想了，是現在呢？
有先進到哪裡嗎？有嗎？
「？」
Work Cited
Abrams, M. H., and Stephen Greenblatt, eds. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 7th ed. Vol. 1. New YOrk: Norton, 2000.
全站熱搜
留言列表
